There might be a small impact from changing innodb_flush_neighbors on this workload from both the TPS results and the amount of data written to disk per update. In a previous blog post I explained the impact of this parameter on the insert benchmark for pure-disk servers. The benefit there was much greater than here. I think there are fewer dirty pages per extent in this workload because the database is much larger than RAM so the feature is less likely to be used.
The test configuration is described in a previous post. The only difference here is that I repeated the test for innodb_flush_neighbors set to 0, 1 and 2.
TPS
configuration 8 clients 16 clients 32 clients 64 clients
flush_neighbors=0 498 677 926 969
flush_neighbors=1 506 692 848 1004
flush_neighbors=2 543 737 913 1043
KB/update written to disk
configuration 8 clients 16 clients 32 clients 64 clients
flush_neighbors=0 7.95 6.75 5.88 6.55
flush_neighbors=1 7.91 6.71 6.53 6.50
flush_neighbors=2 7.78 6.68 6.68 6.74
No comments:
Post a Comment