tl;dr
- Results here are mostly similar to results from the previous test but ...
- MyRocks does better here relative to other engines, so it suffers less from contention.
- InnoDB and TokuDB don't do as well on this test as on the previous test so they suffer more from contention.
Results without pictures
All of the data is here. The data below is the QPS ratio comparing the QPS for MyRocks, InnoDB 5.7.17 and TokuDB 5.7.17 with InnoDB 5.6.35. A value less than one means the QPS for the engine is less than for InnoDB 5.6.35.
QPS ratio:
* rocks = myrocks.none / inno5635
* inno = inno5717 / inno5635
* toku = toku5717.none / inno5635
1 connection
rocks inno toku engine/test
1.765 1.306 0.995 update-index
1.049 1.122 0.421 update-nonindex
0.842 1.020 0.351 update-nonindex-special
4.415 1.821 1.111 delete-only
0.988 1.166 0.329 read-write.range100
1.189 1.300 1.339 read-write.range10000
0.910 1.092 0.358 read-only.range100
0.980 0.966 1.246 read-only.range10000
0.862 0.950 0.257 point-query
0.949 0.949 0.271 random-points
0.515 0.885 0.606 hot-points
0.963 0.991 0.324 insert-only
8 connections
rocks inno toku engine/test
5.958 2.644 2.782 update-index
1.513 1.434 0.473 update-nonindex
1.289 1.422 0.365 update-nonindex-special
1.542 0.995 0.275 delete-only
1.206 1.306 0.253 read-write.range100
1.002 1.288 1.159 read-write.range10000
1.017 1.083 0.329 read-only.range100
0.871 1.069 1.191 read-only.range10000
0.862 0.855 0.204 point-query
0.915 0.859 0.208 random-points
0.890 1.194 0.758 hot-points
0.951 1.149 0.353 insert-only
48 connections
rocks inno toku engine/test
3.836 2.340 1.492 update-index
2.425 2.520 0.312 update-nonindex
2.112 2.981 0.557 update-nonindex-special
3.028 1.950 0.306 delete-only
1.790 1.643 0.122 read-write.range100
1.488 1.883 0.768 read-write.range10000
0.820 1.005 0.093 read-only.range100
0.903 1.219 0.579 read-only.range10000
0.854 0.971 0.079 point-query
0.871 0.953 0.096 random-points
0.739 1.286 0.698 hot-points
1.768 1.579 0.491 insert-only
Results with pictures
Sorry, no charts this time. Charts from the previous post are close enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment