- Linux syscall perf mostly improved from 3.0 to 4.0 then went bad starting with 4.7 thanks to 5 security changes - Spectre, Meltdown, harden usercopy, randomize slab freelist, user pagefault handling.
- Linux has a lot of variance in syscall performance across releases, more than I am used to with MySQL. But MySQL still has regressions across release just without so much variance. Interesting posts for Postgres perf across versions are here, here and here. AFAIK Linux can't move as fast as we need it to and avoid the variance, so the it is caught and fixed after the fact.
- Results are for Intel CPUs. It would be interesting to see results for AMD and for Intel with and without HT enabled.
Monday, November 11, 2019
Linux syscall performance regressions explained
There is a paper in SOSP 2019 that explains Linux system call performance for recent kernels. Explaining performance is what I do so I appreciate the effort that went into this paper:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How to find Lua scripts for sysbench using LUA_PATH
sysbench is a great tool for benchmarks and I appreciate all of the work the maintainer (Alexey Kopytov) put into it as that is often a tha...
-
This provides additional results for Postgres versions 11 through 16 vs Sysbench on a medium server. My previous post is here . The goal is ...
-
I often use HWE kernels with Ubuntu and currently use Ubuntu 22.04. Until recently that meant I ran Linux 6.2 but after a recent update I am...
-
I need stable performance from the servers I use for benchmarks. I also need servers that don't run too hot because too-hot servers caus...
No comments:
Post a Comment