MongoDB 3.0 is almost here. It includes the WiredTiger storage engine which is very impressive. Alas, now we are told that the original storage engine has performance problems. I am shocked. Who knew? Not anyone reading their documentation. I don't understand why companies play this game. Be honest with your users as this goes a long way to building a solid and educated community. I hold MySQL to the same standard. Lets us not forget that awesome manual section on atomic operations.
Don't let the marketing team have editorial control over the documentation team.
Edit: an era has ended, the section on atomic operations has been removed from the MySQL manual.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Postgres 17.4 vs sysbench on a large server, revisited part 2
I recently shared two posts ( here and here ) with results for sysbench on a large server using Postgres versions 10 through 17. In general...
-
This provides additional results for Postgres versions 11 through 16 vs Sysbench on a medium server. My previous post is here . The goal is ...
-
I need stable performance from the servers I use for benchmarks. I also need servers that don't run too hot because too-hot servers caus...
-
I often use HWE kernels with Ubuntu and currently use Ubuntu 22.04. Until recently that meant I ran Linux 6.2 but after a recent update I am...
Mark, my group owns documentation at MongoDB. We strive for accuracy above all else. If there are particular pages that need improvement, please let us know. The Docs project is a public Jira project (https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/DOCS) and you have filed tickets in the past. When you do, we work hard to make corrections.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I have already filed a few requests and the response has been excellent.
Delete