MongoDB 3.0 is almost here. It includes the WiredTiger storage engine which is very impressive. Alas, now we are told that the original storage engine has performance problems. I am shocked. Who knew? Not anyone reading their documentation. I don't understand why companies play this game. Be honest with your users as this goes a long way to building a solid and educated community. I hold MySQL to the same standard. Lets us not forget that awesome manual section on atomic operations.
Don't let the marketing team have editorial control over the documentation team.
Edit: an era has ended, the section on atomic operations has been removed from the MySQL manual.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
RocksDB on a big server: LRU vs hyperclock, v2
This post show that RocksDB has gotten much faster over time for the read-heavy benchmarks that I use. I recently shared results from a lar...
-
This provides additional results for Postgres versions 11 through 16 vs Sysbench on a medium server. My previous post is here . The goal is ... -
I am trying out a dedicated server from Hetzner for my performance work. I am trying the ax162-s that has 48 cores (96 vCPU), 128G of RAM a...
-
I often use HWE kernels with Ubuntu and currently use Ubuntu 22.04. Until recently that meant I ran Linux 6.2 but after a recent update I am...
Mark, my group owns documentation at MongoDB. We strive for accuracy above all else. If there are particular pages that need improvement, please let us know. The Docs project is a public Jira project (https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/DOCS) and you have filed tickets in the past. When you do, we work hard to make corrections.
ReplyDeleteThanks. I have already filed a few requests and the response has been excellent.
Delete