Storage efficiency is a big deal. I have learned a lot about read, write and space amplification over the past few years. Tiered storage has been a part of my work life via flashcache, but tiered storage for an LSM doesn't require flashcache. This is going to get interesting. We have more choices for SSD at a variety of price points based on write endurance and performance. We have write-optimized database engines (RocksDB, Tokutek, WiredTiger) arriving for OLTP workloads. We can use this with commodity hardware and open-source DBMS solutions like MySQL and MongoDB. A lot of interesting work remains to put the pieces together while matching the quality of service we get from MySQL+InnoDB and I hope to use RocksDB as part of MySQL and MongoDB.
We are beginning to engage with the community. Yoshinori Matsunobu has a talk at the MySQL UC. I have a talk at the CloudDM workshop at ICDE. I expect more talks, hopefully a few conference papers and if you are local then there are RocksDB meetups.
One benefit from RocksDB compared to a b-tree is much better compression and much less write-amplification. I have observed this via linkbench and real workloads. There are many other ways that an LSM can reduce the IO demand from an application. But I don't want to give away too many details until Yoshi and I have done our talks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
RocksDB on a big server: LRU vs hyperclock, v2
This post show that RocksDB has gotten much faster over time for the read-heavy benchmarks that I use. I recently shared results from a lar...
-
This provides additional results for Postgres versions 11 through 16 vs Sysbench on a medium server. My previous post is here . The goal is ...
-
I often use HWE kernels with Ubuntu and currently use Ubuntu 22.04. Until recently that meant I ran Linux 6.2 but after a recent update I am...
-
I am trying out a dedicated server from Hetzner for my performance work. I am trying the ax162-s that has 48 cores (96 vCPU), 128G of RAM a...
No comments:
Post a Comment