Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Historical - InnoDB SMP performance

This is a post about InnoDB SMP performance improvements in 200X written around 2008. It was shared at code.google.com which has since shutdown. It describes work done by my team at Google. The big-3 problems for me back then were: lack of monitoringreplication and InnoDB on many-core.

Introduction

This describes performance improvements from changes in the v2 Google patch. While the changes improve performance in many cases, a lot of work remains to be done. It improves performance on SMP servers by:
  • disabling the InnoDB memory heap and associated mutex
  • replacing the InnoDB rw-mutex and mutex on x86 platforms
  • linking with tcmalloc
While tcmalloc makes some of the workloads much faster, we don't recommend its use yet with MySQL as we are still investigating its behavior.

Database reload

This displays the time to reload a large database shard on a variety of servers (HW + SW). Unless otherwise stated, my.cnf was optimized for a fast (but unsafe) reload with the following values. Note that
  • innodb_flush_method=nosync is only in the Google patch and is NOT crash safe (kind of like MyISAM). This uses a real data set that produces a 100GB+ database.
  • innodb_log_file_size=1300M
  • innodb_flush_method=nosync
  • innodb_buffer_pool_size=8000M
  • innodb_read_io_threads=4
  • innodb_write_io_threads=2
  • innodb_thread_concurrency=20
The data to be reloaded was in one file per table on the db server. Each file was compressed and reloaded by a separate client. Each table was loaded by a separate connection except for the largest tables when there was no other work to be done. 8 concurrent connections were used.

The smpfix RPM is MySQL 5.0.37 plus the v1 Google patch and the SMP fixes that include:
  • InnoDB mutex uses atomic ops
  • InnoDB rw-mutex uses lock free methods to get and set internal lock state
  • tcmalloc is used in place of glibc malloc
  • the InnoDB malloc heap is disabled
The base RPM is MySQL 5.0.37 and the v1 Google patch. It does not have the SMP fixes.

The servers are:
  • 8core - the base RPM on an 8-core x86 server
  • 4core-128M - the base RPM on a 4-core x86 server with innodb_log_file_size=128M
  • 8core-tc4 - the base RPM on an 8-core x86 server with innodb_thread_concurrency=4
  • smpfix-128M - the smpfix RPM with innodb_log_file_size=128M
  • 4core - the base RPM on a 4-core x86 server
  • smpfix-4core - the smpfix RPM on a 4-core x86 server
  • smpfix-512M - the smpfix RPM on an 8-core x86 server with innodb_log_file_size=512M
  • smpfix - the smpfix RPM on an 8-core x86 server
  • onlymalloc - the base RPM on an 8-core x86 server with the InnoDB malloc heap disabled
  • smpfix-notcmalloc - the smpfix RPM on an 8-core x86 server without tcmalloc
The x-axis is time so larger is slower.


Sysbench readwrite

Sysbench includes a transaction processing benchmark. The readwrite version of the sysbench OLTP test is measured here using 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 threads.

The sysbench command line options are:
# N is 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64
 --test=oltp --oltp-table-size=1000000 --max-time=600 --max-requests=0 --mysql-table-engine=innodb --db-ps-mode=disable --mysql-engine-trx=yes --num-threads=N
The my.cnf options are:
innodb_buffer_pool_size=8192M
innodb_log_file_size=1300M
innodb_read_io_threads = 4
innodb_write_io_threads = 4
innodb_file_per_table
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2
innodb_log_buffer_size = 200m
innodb_thread_concurrency=0
log_bin
key_buffer_size = 50m
max_heap_table_size=1000M
max_heap_table_size=1000M
tmp_table_size=1000M
max_tmp_tables=100
The servers are:
  • base - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix
  • tc4 - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix, innodb_thread_concurrency=4
  • smpfix - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix and tcmalloc
  • notcmalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix, not linked with tcmalloc
  • onlymalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the InnoDB malloc heap disabled
  • my4026 - unmodified MySQL 4.0.26
  • my4122 - unmodified MySQL 4.1.22
  • my5067 - unmodified MySQL 5.0.67
  • my5126 - unmodified MySQL 5.1.26
  • goog5037 - the same as base, MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix

Results for sysbench readonly

Sysbench includes a transaction processing benchmark. The readonly version of the sysbench OLTP test is measured here using 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 threads.

The sysbench command line options are:
# N is 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64
 --test=oltp --oltp-read-only --oltp-table-size=1000000 --max-time=600 --max-requests=0 --mysql-table-engine=innodb --db-ps-mode=disable --mysql-engine-trx=yes --num-threads=N
The my.cnf options are:
innodb_buffer_pool_size=8192M
innodb_log_file_size=1300M
innodb_read_io_threads = 4
innodb_write_io_threads = 4
innodb_file_per_table
innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2
innodb_log_buffer_size = 200m
innodb_thread_concurrency=0
log_bin
key_buffer_size = 50m
max_heap_table_size=1000M
max_heap_table_size=1000M
tmp_table_size=1000M
max_tmp_tables=100
The servers are:
  • base - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix
  • tc4 - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix, innodb_thread_concurrency=4
  • smpfix - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix and tcmalloc
  • notcmalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix, not linked with tcmalloc
  • onlymalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the InnoDB malloc heap disabled
  • my4026 - unmodified MySQL 4.0.26
  • my4122 - unmodified MySQL 4.1.22
  • my5067 - unmodified MySQL 5.0.67
  • my5126 - unmodified MySQL 5.1.26
  • goog5037 - the same as base, MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix


Concurrent joins

This test runs a query with a join. It is run using concurrent sessions. The data fits in the InnoDB buffer cache. The query is:
select count(*) from T1, T2 where T1.j > 0 and T1.i = T2.i
The data for T1 and T2 matches that used for the sbtest table by sysbench. This query does a full scan of T1 and joins to T2 by primary key.

The servers are:
  • base - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix
  • tc4 - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix, innodb_thread_concurrency=4
  • smpfix - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix and tcmalloc
  • notcmalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix, not linked with tcmalloc
  • onlymalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the InnoDB malloc heap disabled
  • my4026 - unmodified MySQL 4.0.26
  • my4122 - unmodified MySQL 4.1.22
  • my5067 - unmodified MySQL 5.0.67
  • my5126 - unmodified MySQL 5.1.26
  • goog5037 - the same as base, MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix

I only have results for 8 and 16 core servers here. Lower times are better.

With data from the worst case:
Without data from the worst case:

With data from the worst case:

Without data from the worst case:

Concurrent inserts

This test reloads tables in parallel. Each connection inserts data for a different table. Tests were run using 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 concurrent sessions. The regression for 5.0.37 is in the parser and was fixed by 5.0.54. A separate table is used for each connection. DDL for the tables is:
create table T$i (i int primary key, j int, index jx(j)) engine=innodb
Multi-row insert statements are used that insert 1000 rows per insert statement. Auto-commit is used. The insert statements look like:
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES (0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 2), ..., (999,999);
The servers are:
  • base - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix
  • tc4 - MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix, innodb_thread_concurrency=4
  • smpfix - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix and tcmalloc
  • notcmalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the smp fix, not linked with tcmalloc
  • onlymalloc - MySQL 5.0.37 with the InnoDB malloc heap disabled
  • my4026 - unmodified MySQL 4.0.26
  • my4122 - unmodified MySQL 4.1.22
  • my5067 - unmodified MySQL 5.0.67
  • my5126 - unmodified MySQL 5.1.26
  • goog5037 - the same as base, MySQL 5.0.37 without the smp fix

MySQL 5.0.37 has a performance regression in the parser. This was fixed in 5.0.54. See bug 29921.

Note, lower values for Time are better.
With data from the worst case:
Without data from the worst case:
With data from the worst case:
Without data from the worst case:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Managing CPU frequency for AMD on Ubuntu 22.04

I need stable performance from the servers I use for benchmarks. I also need servers that don't run too hot because too-hot servers caus...